next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: No Title Previous: No Title

References

1
S. Amari, A. Cichocki, and H.H. Yang.
A new learning algorithm for blind source separation.
In Advances in Neural Information Processing 8 (Proc. NIPS'95), pages 757-763. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

2
S.-I. Amari.
Neural learning in structured parameter spaces -- natural riemannian gradient.
In Advances in Neural Information Processing 9 (Proc. NIPS*96), pages 127-133. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

3
H.B. Barlow.
Unsupervised learning.
Neural Computation, 1:295-311, 1989.

4
A. Bell and T. J. Sejnowski.
Edges are the independent components of natural scenes.
In Advances in Neural Information Processing 9 (NIPS*96), pages 831-837. MIT Press, 1997.

5
A.J. Bell and T.J. Sejnowski.
An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.
Neural Computation, 7:1129-1159, 1995.

6
A. Belouchrani, K. Abed Meraim, J.-F. Cardoso, and E. Moulines.
A blind source separation technique based on second order statistics.
IEEE Trans. on S.P., 45(2):434-44, 1997.

7
J.-F. Cardoso.
Infomax and maximum likelihood for source separation.
IEEE Letters on Signal Processing, 4:112-114, 1997.

8
J. F. Cardoso.
Entropic contrasts for source separation.
In S. Haykin, editor, Adaptive Unsupervised Learning. 1998.

9
J.-F. Cardoso and B. Hvam Laheld.
Equivariant adaptive source separation.
IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 44(12):3017-3030, 1996.

10
A. Cichocki, R. Unbehauen, L. Moszczynski, and E. Rummert.
A new on-line adaptive algorithm for blind separation of source signals.
In Proc. Int. Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks ISANN-94, pages 406-411, Tainan, Taiwan, 1994.

11
P. Comon.
Independent component analysis - a new concept?
Signal Processing, 36:287-314, 1994.

12
D. Cook, A. Buja, and J. Cabrera.
Projection pursuit indexes based on orthonormal function expansions.
J. of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2(3):225-250, 1993.

13
N. Delfosse and P. Loubaton.
Adaptive blind separation of independent sources: a deflation approach.
Signal Processing, 45:59-83, 1995.

14
D. Donoho.
On minimum entropy deconvolution.
In Applied Time Series Analysis II, pages 565-608. Academic Press, 1981.

15
S.C. Douglas, A. Cichocki, , and S. Amari.
A bias removal technique for blind source separation with noisy measurements.
Electronics Letters, 1998.
To appear.

16
The FastICA MATLAB package.
Available at http://www.cis.hut.fi/projects/ica/fastica/, 1998.

17
J.H. Friedman.
Exploratory projection pursuit.
J. of the American Statistical Association, 82(397):249-266, 1987.

18
P. Hall.
Polynomial projection pursuit.
The Annals of Statistics, 17:589-605, 1989.

19
H. H. Harman.
Modern Factor Analysis.
University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition, 1967.

20
P.J. Huber.
Projection pursuit.
The Annals of Statistics, 13(2):435-475, 1985.

21
A. Hyvärinen.
A family of fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis.
In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'97), pages 3917-3920, Munich, Germany, 1997.

22
A. Hyvärinen.
Independent component analysis by minimization of mutual information.
Technical Report A46, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, 1997.

23
A. Hyvärinen.
New approximations of differential entropy for independent component analysis and projection pursuit.
In Advances in Neural Information Processing 10 (Proc. NIPS*97), pages 273-279. MIT Press, 1998.

24
A. Hyvärinen.
Sparse regression: Utilizing the higher-order structure of data for prediction.
In Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN'98), Skövde, Sweden, 1998.

25
A. Hyvärinen.
Noisy independent component analysis by gaussian moments.
In Proc. Int. Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA'99), Aussois, France, 1999.
To appear.

26
A. Hyvärinen, P. Hoyer, and E. Oja.
Sparse code shrinkage for image denoising.
In Proc. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, pages 859-864, Anchorage, Alaska, 1998.

27
A. Hyvärinen and E. Oja.
Simple neuron models for independent component analysis.
Int. Journal of Neural Systems, 7(6):671-687, 1996.

28
A. Hyvärinen and E. Oja.
A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis.
Neural Computation, 9(7):1483-1492, 1997.

29
A. Hyvärinen and E. Oja.
Independent component analysis by general nonlinear Hebbian-like learning rules.
Signal Processing, 64(3):301-313, 1998.

30
I.T. Jolliffe.
Principal Component Analysis.
Springer-Verlag, 1986.

31
C. Jutten and J. Herault.
Blind separation of sources, part I: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture.
Signal Processing, 24:1-10, 1991.

32
J. Karhunen, A. Hyvärinen, R. Vigario, J. Hurri, and E. Oja.
Applications of neural blind separation to signal and image processing.
In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'97), pages 131-134, Munich, Germany, 1997.

33
J. Karhunen, E. Oja, L. Wang, R. Vigario, and J. Joutsensalo.
A class of neural networks for independent component analysis.
IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 8(3):486-504, 1997.

34
M. Kendall.
Multivariate Analysis.
Charles Griffin&Co., 1975.

35
L. De Lathauwer, B. De Moor, and J. Vandewalle.
A technique for higher-order-only blind source separation.
In Proc. ICONIP, Hong Kong, 1996.

36
M. Lewicki and B. Olshausen.
Inferring sparse, overcomplete image codes using an efficient coding framework.
In Advances in Neural Information Processing 10 (Proc. NIPS*97), pages 815-821. MIT Press, 1998.

37
E. Moulines, J.-F. Cardoso, and E. Gassiat.
Maximum likelihood for blind separation and deconvolution of noisy signals using mixture models.
In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'97), pages 3617-3620, Munich, Germany, 1997.

38
J.-P. Nadal and N. Parga.
Non-linear neurons in the low noise limit: a factorial code maximizes information transfer.
Network, 5:565-581, 1994.

39
E. Oja.
The nonlinear PCA learning rule in independent component analysis.
Neurocomputing, 17(1):25-46, 1997.

40
B. A. Olshausen and D. J. Field.
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images.
Nature, 381:607-609, 1996.

41
B. A. Olshausen and D. J. Field.
Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?
Vision Research, 37:3311-3325, 1997.

42
P. Pajunen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja.
New results on nonlinear PCA criterion in blind source separation.
Neurocomputing, 1998.
To appear.

43
D.-T. Pham, P. Garrat, and C. Jutten.
Separation of a mixture of independent sources through a maximum likelihood approach.
In Proc. EUSIPCO, pages 771-774, 1992.

44
O. Shalvi and E. Weinstein.
New criteria for blind deconvolution of nonminimum phase systems (channels).
IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 36(2):312-321, 1990.

45
L. Tong, V. Soo, R. Liu, and Y. Huang.
Amuse: a new blind identification algorithm.
In Proc. ISCAS, New Orleans, USA, 1990.

46
R. Vigário.
Extraction of ocular artifacts from EEG using independent component analysis.
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 103(3):395-404, 1997.

47
R. Vigário, V. Jousmäki, M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, and E. Oja.
Independent component analysis for identification of artifacts in magnetoencephalographic recordings.
In Advances in Neural Information Processing 10 (Proc. NIPS'97), Cambridge, MA, 1998. MIT Press.

48
R. Vigário, J. Särelä, and E. Oja.
Independent component analysis in wave decomposition of auditory evoked fields.
In Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN'98), Skövde, Sweden, 1998.



Aapo Hyvarinen
8/27/1998